Commentary for Bava Kamma 229:18

משכנתא שוי מאתן במאה עשו בו תקנת השוק שוה בשוה אמימר אמר לא עשו בו תקנת השוק מר זוטרא אמר עשו בו תקנת השוק

may sue the second, i.e., the claim of the purchaser for repayment should be against the proprietors since the benefit of market overt does apply also here.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where the theft has definitely been established. ');">³¹</span> But does Rab really maintain that the benefit of market overt should not apply here?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where the theft has definitely been established. ');">³¹</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 229:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.